Screenshot of the extrusion exercise from an Esri virtual course in 3D visualization. It shows two layers that have been extruded, one positively and one negatively. |
This Esri video provides a great synopsis of 3D Cartography and this Esri white paper also helped me understand what analyses 3D mapping is capable of performing. While 3D data is immersive and often impressive there are some downsides. Both the video and the white paper mention the pros and cons so I will briefly touch on them.
While a 3D world immediately draws the user in, it can be difficult to navigate and it is easy to get disoriented. However, this type of map interface is rich with visual information that cannot be delivered in the 2D format. For instance, the ability to show vertical information (a z element) in a 3D world can help the user understand exactly how a building can shade a region, if a building possesses enough exposure to the sun to make use of solar panels. In terms of parcels, vertical height can convey all sorts of parcel data (like varying property values). That brings us to intuitive symbology. In a 2D map, there is a necessary reliance upon a legend which is not as necessary in a 3D environment. 3D mapping does require a computer that is capable of performing graphically intensive tasks. That can be expensive and some cartographers may need training so time and cost are additional concerns.
I particularly enjoyed this module. I did thesis work using 3D images of anthropoid skulls which can be considered maps of the face. I spent many hours using 3D imaging software so I felt comfortable working with the 3D visualization techniques I used for mapping. I am looking forward to making 3D maps for years to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment